Revisi dan Implementasi Panduan Rotasi Klinik (Logbook)-Studi Kasus dalam Pendidikan Klinik di FK Universitas Mataram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/jku.v8i3.348Keywords:
clinical rotation guidance, logbook, clinical education.Abstract
Background: Clinical rotation guidance (logbook) in clinical education is very important to provide the structure and focus of teaching and learning activities for both students and clinical supervisors. Implementation of clinical education itself faces many challenges, however the problems and challenges in each faculty of medicine are different. This paper aims to identify the problems and challenges encountered during the revision process and the implementation of the logbook. Method: Case studies are carried out by taking notes during the curriculum revision and implementation process. The analysis was carried out by reflecting on the ongoing revision process. Results: Before the revision process, 10 of the 13 sections of the clinic had guidelines. The main problem faced is the lack of uniformity of perception about clinical rotation logbook and their contents. The revision process begins with socialization to build mutual commitment. The leadership of FK UNRAM has made an important contribution to building commitment and providing support for the revision process led by the Medical Education Unit (MEU). Through internal consolidation MEU developed the logbook format to be used. Prior to implementation, socialization to clinical supervisors and students was conducted to ensure smooth implementation.
Conclusion: The revision of the clinical rotation logbook is basically changing the clinical education system and curriculum. Joint commitment of the clinical department, involvement and support of the leadership, active involvement of the clinician in decision making, as well as socialization of guidelines to all parties involved will support the success of this process.
References
2. Dennick R. Case study 2: use of logbooks. Medic Educ. 2000; 34(Suppl.1): S 66-68
3. Schutttpelz-Brauns K, Narciss E, Schneyinck C, Bohme K, Brustle P, Mau-Holzmann U. et al. Twelve tips for successfully implementing logbooks in clinical training. Med Teach [internet]. 2016 [diakses tanggal 27 September 2016], 38: 564-569. Tersedia dari: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926785/pdf/imte-38-564.pdf
4. Jacobs JCG, Bolhuis S, Bulte JA, Laan R, & Holdrinet RSG. Starting learning in medical practice: an evaluation of a new introductory clerkship. Med Teach. 2005; 27(5): 408-414.
5. Chiesa D, Escalante R, van Wyk J, Bollela V. Evaluating logbooks to improve clerkship learning experiences. Med Educ. 2013; 47: 1122-1123.
6. Ramani, S. & Leinster, S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008; 30: 347-364.
7. Khorashadizadeh F, & Alavinia SM. Students’ perception about logbooks: Advantages, limitation and recommendation – a qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc [internet], 2012 [diakses tanggal 28 September 2016], 62(11): 1184–1186. Tersedia dari: http://www.jpma.org.pk/PdfDownload/3799.pdf
8. Macallan DC, Kent A, Holmes SC, Farmer EA, & McCrorie P. A model of clinical problem-based learning for clinical attachments in medicine. Med Educ. 2009; 43: 799-807.
9. Tiwari A, Lai P, So M, & Yuen K. A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Med Educ; 2006; 40: 547-554.
10. Norcini JJ. Workplace assessment. Dalam: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. hlm 232-245
11. Wimmers PF, Schmidt HG & Splinter TA. Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical competence. Med Educ. 2006; 40(5): 450–458.
12. Huang GC, Almeida JM, & Roberts DH. Reaching the limits of mandated self-reporting: Clinical logbooks do not predict clerkship performance. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 185-18.
